🔗 Share this article

Turns out Ruben Amorim endured a loss to Grimsby. Survive a decisive continental showpiece versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood losing at home against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, squandering some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling his team the worst in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach came at the executive and seems to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, based on his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, he has proved himself as one of football's true generals: a strategic mind that United’s competitors are now justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Clash Over System & Philosophy

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Naturally, these entreaties faced pushback. However, these judgements hold greater authority when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, without any penalty clause activated. The director speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the commands of his superior the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be determined by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical football matters, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Whom else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

The New Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to join an organization and see their vision through to completion. But how many businesses have such individuals established? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to invest the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire a coach who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of very young players into Europe and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged while those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility Only for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss them for playing too much that system. Hire the project manager and then bin him for requiring too long. And above all show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.