🔗 Share this article ‘It’s devastating’: the way 30 captive white whales are being used as bargaining chips in row over animal welfare. Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an cute small “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – called “Onion” – is a big but very loyal friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet is the “most affectionate” with a kind nature. Thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canadian amusement park have been entangled in a struggle between a shuttered park, public officials and welfare campaigners. But those closest to the whales say the heated controversy over their destiny often ignores the complexities of the whales who, after living their entire lives in captivity, have been carefully observed by the people who see them each day. After the national authorities disallowed the transfer of the belugas to China, the struggling attraction near the famous falls where they are housed stated it would consider to end their lives unless the authorities funds the cost of keeping them alive. Canada’s marine resources official has rejected that request, placing the thirty whales in an ever more uncertain position. Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals Experts say that beluga whales’ brain structure, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and social skills suggest they are highly cognitive animals – something one caretaker observed directly. Burgess spent a significant period as a whale caretaker, a job that required gaining confidence of the marine predators. “Developing those connections over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of care. At the start, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so wonderful and fulfilling.” Burgess knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was even so astounded by the details and quirks in their dispositions. She cultivated a special affection for a pair of whales with opposing natures. “Eve accepted me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “Each changed the way I understand connection.” Growing Opposition and Facility Decline Burgess’s connection with the whales developed against a context of rising activist criticism to their enclosure. During her three years at the facility, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, died. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a toll which the park links to expected lifespan, but which activists say points to the substandard environment in which they were maintained. The park did not admit visitors to the public over the recent season, but the former trainer says she observed directly results of the shutdown. “Concrete is deteriorating from the pools because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are inquisitive and so they pick it up and navigate with chunks in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.” The facility did not respond to a request for comment, but earlier asserted: “The whales … receive far better medical attention and constant supervision than any person in the UK, or elsewhere.” Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions Burgess was fired from the park in the spring following the passing of a beluga, an ailing beluga the caretakers had to euthanize. She said the park thought information of the death were leaked to the news outlets and she was let go shortly thereafter. The ambiguity over the whales’ future has left her and other caretakers in anguish. She says the facility’s ultimatum to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “extremely difficult” undertaking, adding any attempts to put down even a single beluga would require “immense manpower”, vehicles and heavy equipment. “It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said. Burgess supports calls for the whales to be removed right away from the facility, with its deteriorating pools and reduced personnel. In the autumn, the nation’s government official turned down a bid to send the whales to an overseas location. “To approve the request would have meant a ongoing situation in captivity and a reversion to display for amusement,” the official stated. “As society, we know that marine mammals should be in the ocean, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in clear conscience approve an transfer that would continue the treatment these belugas have suffered.” But the former trainer said the official’s remarks reveal a more general incorrect perception of the facts of existence for belugas born in captivity. “The public needs to grasp these are whales that have existed solely in enclosed habitats and they will need human care for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “Many just don’t realize that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.” Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate As officials attempt to find a resolution, ideas have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. An idea called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of Canada’s north – where whales are a important part of sustenance for local populations. A suggested protected area in the province of eastern Canada, which now received official endorsement, has proven contentious. The planned location, which includes extensive space of enclosed sea water, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain positive that it could ultimately represent a long term answer for a number of the whales. But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s spoken with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ future. Some experts say the possibility of a protected habitat indicates a worldwide trend away from captive facilities and could represent a workable plan in the near future. The project lead, leader of the sanctuary project, said the facility will replicate the cognitive activities and diet the whales get from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger environment. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|